BREAKING : Dem Party Strategists Finally Admit “Russia” Is Not Why Hillary Lost

 

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, husband, former U.S. President Bill Clinton, and VP nominee Kaine, listen to her concession speech in New York

Democratic Party strategists are finally admitting it was not Putin that caused Hillary’s demise.

Her base had zero enthusiasm for her, and Obama voters voted for Trump across the country.

Sorry, Rachel Maddow to ruin your Russia conspiracy theory. 

From MiamiHerald

A select group of top Democratic Party strategists have used new data about last year’s presidential election to reach a startling conclusion about why Hillary Clinton lost. Now they just need to persuade the rest of the party they’re right.

<IMG width=”1″ height=”1″ class=”beacon-pxl beacon-one” style=”border: 0px currentColor; border-image: none; display: none;” alt=”Quantcast” src=”http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-aD1qr93XuF6aC.gif?labels=Publishers.Publisher-52594,Widgets.Widget-62394″ border=”0″>

Many Democrats have a shorthand explanation for Clinton’s defeat: Her base didn’t turn out, Donald Trump’s did and the difference was too much to overcome.

But new information shows that Clinton had a much bigger problem with voters who had supported President Barack Obama in 2012 but backed Trump four years later.

Those Obama-Trump voters, in fact, effectively accounted for more than two-thirds of the reason Clinton lost, according to Matt Canter, a senior vice president of the Democratic political firm Global Strategy Group. In his group’s analysis, about 70 percent of Clinton’s failure to reach Obama’s vote total in 2012 was because she lost these voters.

In recent months, Canter and other members of Global Strategy Group have delivered a detailed report of their findings to senators, congressmen, fellow operatives and think tank wonks – all part of an ongoing effort to educate party leaders about what the data says really happened in last year’s election.

“We have to make sure we learn the right lesson from 2016, that we don’t just draw the lesson that makes us feel good at night, make us sleep well at night,” Canter said.

His firm’s conclusion is shared broadly by other Democrats who have examined the data, including senior members of Clinton’s campaign and officials at the Democratic data and analytics firm Catalist. (The New York Times, doing its own analysis, reached a similar conclusion.)
Advertisements