Daily Archives: April 8, 2017

Syria Gas Attack What You’re Not Being Told! – Dead Girl From Syria Gas Attack Opens Her Eyes – Fake Propaganda [VIDEO]


 

 

 

Published on Apr 5, 2017


 

 

Published on Apr 6, 2017

Advertisements

Syria & Donald Trump – What’s Going On? David Icke Special on the Richie Allen Show 4/7/2017 [VIDEO]

 

Published on Apr 7, 2017


America is Acting as ISIS Air Force – Arab American Journalist Rania Khalek  [VIDEO]

 

 

Published on Apr 7, 2017


The Truth About Trump’s Air Strike on Syria – Paul Joseph Watson  [VIDEO]

 

 

Published on Apr 7, 2017

 

 

 

On Syria, ‘a metamorphosis of Trump into Hillary Clinton’ – news editor [VIDEO]

 

Published on Apr 7, 2017
T AND H 2222222222222222

When dozens of people died of an apparent gas attack in Idlib, Syria this week, the immediate American reaction was to blame the Assad regime. But US and NATO have a vested interest in disrupting Syria and replacing its government. Mnar Muhawesh, editor in chief of MintPress News, joins RT America’s Anya Parampil to discuss inconsistencies in the US official narrative regarding this week’s atrocity and the potential suppression of evidence that contradicts Washington’s fixation on regime change in Syria.

‘Dog returns to its own vomit: We forgot lesson of Iraq’ – former UK ambassador to Syria on US strike [VIDEO]

 

Published on Apr 7, 2017

The US launched a missile strike on a Syrian airbase, killing at least six people, including civilians, and wounding several others. Peter Ford, the former British ambassador to Syria,joins RT to discuss the US missile attack.

US strike helping ISIS, Al-Qaeda, the enemy US supposed to fight against – Ron Paul [VIDEO]

 

Published on Apr 7, 2017

The UN security Council is holding an emergency meeting on the US missile attack on a Syrian airbase. To discuss the UN Security Council meeting we’re joined by Ron Paul, chairman and founder of The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.

Was it really sarin, was Assad to blame and could Western spy agencies be involved?

Historian and terrorism expert MICHAEL BURLEIGH answers key questions about Syrian airstrikes

 

Those white helmets… Immune to sarin.. Amazing isn’t it..

 

Was sarin gas actually used in Tuesday’s attack?

The evidence for sarin use largely comes from reports from Turkish doctors treating survivors of the Syria attack.

Victims in the rebel-held town of Khan Sheikhoun were choking, foaming at the mouth, defecating and vomiting – all of which is consistent with sarin use.

Sarin, a colourless, odourless liquid at room temperature, is expensive and complex to manufacture.

The two key chemical compounds – a phosphorus variant and isopropyl alcohol – are mixed near the point of use, usually hours before it is released.

This is to avoid accidents and degradation in storage. The level of sophistication required in handling sarin would suggest state involvement.

Syrian president Bashar al-Assad was supposed to have surrendered his entire chemical weapons stockpile – including sarin – to Russia after an earlier attack on an opposition-held area near Damascus in 2013. More than 1,000 victims died and only a Russian-brokered deal – with Assad agreeing to give up his chemical weapons for destruction – prevented US air strikes then. According to some reports, a consignment of sarin was missing from the stockpile handed over.

Syria Hoax : Another Syrian ‘victim’ caught laughing on camera after pretending to be hurt from the “chemical attack” today:

At the same time, Assad signed up to the Chemical Weapons Convention, a group of states which ban these weapons. However, chlorine gas, which produces similar symptoms to sarin, was not covered by the removal deal. And unlike sarin (which is 3,000 times more lethal) chlorine is easily accessible and has many everyday uses.

Medecins Sans Frontieres doctors, who treated some victims, said that both a toxic nerve agent and chlorine may have been used. But until impartial experts establish whether, and what, chemical weapons were involved, reliance on the observations of doctors is insufficient.

Why would Assad use chemical weapons in a war he’s winning?

This is indeed a perplexing question. Since September 2015, when the Russians first intervened in Syria, Assad’s regime has made steady progress in defeating various rebel opponents, notably when his forces took Aleppo in December.

In recent days the US has strongly suggested it was prepared to leave Assad in power, as it saw him as a potential ally in the fight against Islamic State. Syria’s military has categorically denied it was responsible for the attack. Of course, Assad has used various weapons indiscriminately against civilians, including barrel bombs (dropped from helicopters) and unfocused artillery bombardment. He has also ‘weaponised’ gases – for example, putting tear gas in shells used by police to quell rioters.

I believe, however, that he would have to be insanely overconfident to have brazenly used sarin, not least because of the risk – since realised – of US reprisals and greater involvement in the area.

All the evidence is that this cruel and calculating man is not insane.

He is intent, though, on corralling the remaining rebels in this area of Idlib province. This act of terror may have been a signal that he felt he could act with impunity, following the US ambassador to the UN saying last week that America was dropping calls for the Syrian president to stand down.

If not Assad, then who was it and why?

Charges of using chemical weapons are a very useful propaganda tool to blacken the reputation of any opponent, however dark already. Conspiracy theorists will see various nefarious hands at work.

The Russians, who back Assad’s regime, claim the Syrian air force bombed chemical munitions held by rebel forces in a warehouse, which then exploded. Another claim is that it was a gas manufacturing plant.

Such a strike would probably have destroyed what sarin there was and distributed the rest over a smaller area, affecting fewer victims.

Given that the highly flammable isopropyl alcohol is one of the chemicals in sarin, a fireball might have been expected but there are no reports of this.

The numbers of women and children caught up in the attack would also rule against a rebel-held munitions depot in the immediate area.

Sarin can be delivered via shells, but some witnesses saw ‘chemical bombs’ falling. The first reports from the site described a crater where a chemical-bearing rocket was said to have landed. There were no structural remains suggesting an explosion at a warehouse.

While it is possible that rebel forces acquired the chemicals to make sarin, or other nerve agents, these are unlikely to have been in large enough quantities to cause so many casualties.

Could Western spy agencies be involved?

Some of the more outlandish conspiracy theories suggest that Western intelligence forces, such as the CIA, might have been responsible for the gas attack – possibly as a way of distracting from the Trump administration’s alleged Russian links.

Certainly, Russia has responded to the air strikes on Syria with some tough talk. But this speculation owes more to spy fiction than fact.

IS has also been suggested as the culprit, but the terror group is not present in any meaningful way in this area of Syria.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4392336/MICHEAL-BURLEIGH-really-sarin-Assad-blame.html