Daily Archives: January 27, 2017

Rand Paul: Only Eight Senators Have Any Idea How Many Covert Wars The CIA Is Waging

cia-logo-2222222222222222

Source: Real Clear Politics

 

In an interview with ABC News, Donald Trump said today that he believes torture works and that he was surprised to learn that his Defense Secretary disagreed. Republican Senator Rand Paul weighs in on that, President Trump’s executive order limiting the Syrian refugee program, and why the intelligence community needs more oversight:

“There are only eight members of Congress that truly know what is going on in the CIA,” he said. “That truly know what is going on as far as covert war around the world.”

RAND PAUL: I think the CIA needs more oversight. Our intelligence community has very little oversight. There are only eight members of Congress that truly know what is going on in the CIA. That truly know what is going on as far as covert war around the world.And I really think that war –unless there is an extraordinary exception– should be fought with the approval of the Congress, and the approval of the American people. That is what our founding fathers thought. They took that power away from the president, and gave it to Congress. They specificaly precluded the president from going to war without the approval of Congress.

Share This Article…

http://www.blacklistednews.com/Rand_Paul%3A_Only_Eight_Senators_Have_Any_Idea_How_Many_Covert_Wars_The_CIA_Is_Waging/56530/0/38/38/Y/M.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Mathematician Uncovers Widespread Election Fraud

A mathematician says she has uncovered evidence of widespread election fraud and claims government officials are trying to silence her.

A mathematician from Kansas says she has uncovered evidence of widespread election fraud from this year’s election and claims government officials are trying to silence her. 

According to Wichita State mathematician Beth Clarkson, irregularities in election returns from across the United States are being ignored by State officials in order to cover-up the magnitude of election fraud committed.

Accmag.com reports:

Analyzing election returns at a precinct level, Clarkson found that candidate support was correlated, to a statistically significant degree, with the size of the precinct. In Republican primaries, the bias has been toward the establishment candidates over tea partiers.

In general elections, it has favored Republican candidates over Democrats, even when the demographics of the precincts in question suggested that the opposite should have been true.

Clarkson’s interest in election returns was piqued by a 2012 paper released by analysts Francois Choquette and James Johnson showing the same pattern of election returns, which favor establishment Republican candidates in primaries and general elections. The irregularities are isolated to precincts that use “Central Tabulator” voting machines — machines that have previously been shown to be vulnerable to hacking. The effects are significant and widespread: According to their analysis, Mitt Romney could have received over a million extra votes in the 2012 Republican primary, mostly coming at the expense of Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich. President Obama also ceded significant votes to John McCain due to this irregularity, as well.

While Clarkson has found the same statistical irregularity in a number of localities, her efforts to confirm whether they amount to fraud have been centered on Sedgwick County, Kansas, due to the locality’s use of Real Time Voting Machine Paper Tapes, which provide a paper trail that other localities don’t have. However, her efforts to verify Sedgwick County’s election returns have been repeatedly shut down.

She first requested a recount of the 2013 election, but the timeframe in which a recount could have been requested had passed. She then requested the machines’ computer records from the Sedgwick County registrar, which told her to kindly shove off and sue Secretary of State Kris Kobach if she wanted the records so badly.

When Clarkson initially filed her lawsuit requesting the paper records from the voting machines, her suit was denied because a judge ruled that the paper records constituted ballots, shielding them from the state’s open records law. This ruling is suspect at best, given that the paper records do not have voters’ names assigned to them; they only record when and how a ballot was cast for recount purposes.

She then sought a court order giving her access to a sample of voting records in order to check voting machines’ error rates. This order was ignored by the Secretary of State’s office, despite their being legally required to respond to her within 30 days. The office later said that they didn’t realize they had received her request.

Given Kansas’s professed diehard commitment to combatting election fraud, one would think that they would be all for analysis into whether the integrity of their elections have been compromised. Apparently you’d be wrong.

http://investmentwatchblog.com/mathematician-uncovers-widespread-election-fraud/

Hillary Clinton Received One Million Votes From Illegal Aliens

illegals-111111111111111111

A new study reveals that Hillary Clinton received at least 800,000 votes from non-citizens during this years Presidential election, verifying claims made by President Trump.

Political scientist Jesse Richman from Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, published the research this week which he says conclusively proves that Clinton “won” the popular vote illegitimately.

Washingtontimes.com reports:

Based on national polling by a consortium of universities, a report by Mr. Richman said 6.4 percent of the estimated 20 million adult noncitizens in the U.S. voted in November. He extrapolated that that percentage would have added 834,381 net votes for Mrs. Clinton, who received about 2.8 million more votes than Mr. Trump.

Mr. Richman calculated that Mrs. Clinton would have collected 81 percent of noncitizen votes.

“Is it plausible that non-citizen votes added to Clinton’s margin? Yes,” Mr. Richman wrote. “Is it plausible that non-citizen votes account for the entire nation-wide popular vote margin held by Clinton? Not at all.”

Still, the finding is significant because it means noncitizens may have helped Mrs. Clinton carry a state or finish better than she otherwise would have.

Mr. Trump’s unverified accusation to congressional leaders this week, as reported by The Washington Post, has sent the issue skyward.

He apparently was referring to all types of fraud, such as the “dead” voting or multiple votes from the same person. But the thrust of his estimate appears to be that illegal immigrants and noncitizens carried the popular vote.

He returned to the issue Thursday in Philadelphia, where he spoke to congressional Republicans mapping this year’s legislative calendar.

“We also need to keep the ballot box safe from illegal voting,” the president said. “And, believe me, you take a look at what’s registering, folks. Take a look at what’s registering. We are going to protect the integrity of the ballot box, and we are going to defend the votes of the American citizen, so important.”

The mainstream media reacted to Mr. Trump’s assertion with derision. Liberal pundits said there is no evidence of fraud.

CNN’s Jake Tapper called it “a stunning allegation for which the White House is providing no evidence. And there is a reason they are providing no evidence — there is no evidence. It is not true.”

Esquire.com said, “The most bizarre lie of Donald Trump’s presidency so far is his claim of widespread voter fraud in an election he won.”

But conservative activists say the liberal media are ignoring evidence — that noncitizen voting is illegal and, thus, fraud.

They say the Justice Department in the Obama administration was more concerned with preventing states from cleansing rosters of dead and inactive voters than in mounting any investigation into fraud.

“Most voters are never asked for voter ID, so it is dishonest to suggest that with the tens of millions of illegal and legal aliens here, there is no voter fraud,” said Tom Fitton, who heads the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch. “If the key Old Dominion study results on the 2008 election are applied to 2016 — 1.41 million aliens may have voted illegally, with 1.13 million voting for Democrats.”

“A federal voter fraud investigation is long overdue,” Mr. Fitton said. “It would be a simple matter of analyzing voter registration databases against federal databases of aliens and deceased individuals. Why is the left afraid to even ask the questions? The jig is up.”

There does not appear to be any concerted postelection effort by states to take on the daunting task of checking voter rolls and ballots to verify citizenship. In some states, no ID is required to register and vote.

In the absence of detailed accounting, the only scientific way to make an estimate is by post-vote polling.

Mr. Richman relies on a one-of-a-kind poll: the Cooperative Congressional Election Survey. Every two years, a consortium of 28 universities produces a detailed report on voters and their views based on polling by YouGov.

Tucked inside the lengthy questionnaire is a question on citizenship status: A significant number of respondents anonymously acknowledged they were not citizens when they voted.

Three professors at Old Dominion University — Mr. Richman, Gulshan A. Chattha and David C. Earnest — took these answers, did further research and extrapolated that of a 19.4 million estimate of adult noncitizens, about 620,000 were illegally registered to vote in the 2008 presidential election. Using other measuring tools, they said, the actual number of noncitizen voters could be as low as 38,000 and as high as 2.8 million.

The U.S. Census Bureau reported in 2012 that there are 22 million noncitizens in the country. The group comprises illegal immigrants and people in the U.S. legally on a visa or permanent resident green card. Of this 22 million, 20 million were 18 or older, the U.S. voting age requirement.

Conservatives have long suspected that Democrats are tacitly encouraging illegal immigrants to vote. Liberal leaders have created “sanctuary cities” across the nation that refuse to work with federal immigration enforcement authorities.

President Obama was asked during the campaign last year if illegal immigrants had anything to fear from federal authorities if they voted in the presidential race.

“Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens — and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country — are fearful of voting,” he was asked on a Latino YouTube channel. “‘So if I vote, will Immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?’”

“Not true, and the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself,” Mr. Obama said. “And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, etc. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential.”

Some conservatives interpreted Mr. Obama’s answer as a go-ahead signal, with his questionable assertion that voter rolls are off limits to federal investigators.

The WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign manger John Podesta’s emails contained one message on directing immigrants to vote. He said immigrants should obtain driver’s licenses and then attest at a polling place that they are U.S. citizens.

http://investmentwatchblog.com/hillary-clinton-recieved-one-million-votes-from-illegal-aliens/

Newt Gingrich Calls For MADONNA Arrest – I Would Be Arrested If It Were Me

madonna-333333333333333333

by Pamela Williams

Madonna revealed that she practiced Jewish witchcraft on Election night to Make Trump lose.  She had her Muslim “agent” read the QURAN while she focused on President Trump’s image on the TV.  I am infuriated that she has not been arrested as of yet.  C’mon, I would have already been arrested and questioned.  It will set a bad example if the authorities do nothing.  I hope the Secret Service is taking this seriously.

Speaking to Harper’s Bazaar, Madonna described focussing on Trump’s image on the TV screen while “lighting candles, meditating, praying, offering our lives” as her agent and friend recited verses from the Quran.  She goes on to say that her agent knew someone who worked on the Clinton campaign, and that early in the night they heard that things were not going as expected for the Democratic nominee.

Oh, yeah, I am sure her “agent” did know someone who worked on the Clinton campaign, because that was the “dark” side of the Election.  That is why Jason Chaffetz is investigating Clinton as we speak.  Something else I read this morning which has me infuriated…Hillary Clinton wants a talk show!  Can someone under criminal investigation get a talk show?  No!!!

Madonna went on to tell Harper’s Bazaar…now get this:

We were doing everything: lighting candles, meditating, praying, offering our lives to God forever, if only,” said the 58-year-old, seemingly puzzled that God wasn’t interested in answering the prayers of a woman who earlier in the campaign promised oral relations with anybody who voted for Hillary.  Explaining that she “always gets what she wants”, Madonna said she is unable to accept what has happened: “It’s like being dumped by a lover and also being stuck in a nightmare.”

In the end, Trump defeated Clinton, and months later Madonna is still struggling to accept that her mystical witchcraft was not enough to overpower the will of the American people.  Don’t you feel sorry for poor old Madonna witch?  I am absolutely in shock that she thinks she should get what she wanted, when she probably did not even bother to vote.  I wish she would leave this Country…we could do with one less witch.

Newt Gingrich is asking that Madonna be arrested, and Newt as usual speaks the truth with a deep mindfulness.

He went on to say:  Newt Gingrich: She is parallel to the young fascists running around town breaking windows. All of them should be given maximum sentence… What you have is an emerging left-wing fascism. She’s part of it. And I think we have to be prepared to protect ourselves. Frankly, she ought to be, the truth is she ought to be arrested.

Source:

http://investmentwatchblog.com/newt-gingrich-calls-for-madonna-arrest-i-would-be-arrested-if-it-were-me-madonna-practiced-jewish-witchcraft-against-trump-while-reading-the-quran/

Hillary’s 2 Doctors At TRUMP Ceremony! Clinton DYING? (Parkinson’s / Collapse) (Video)

 

Published on Jan 27, 2017

HILLARY CLINTON GETS ESCORTED BY TWO (2) DOCTORS AT TRUMP’S INAUGURATION (2017). THESE SAME 2 DOCTORS WERE AT GROUND ZERO HOLDING HILLARY UPRIGHT, TRYING TO PREVENT ANOTHER SEIZURE — BUT THEY FAILED, AS HILLARY COLLAPSED AND GOT THROWN INTO HER BLACK AMBULANCE VAN.

WHY ARE 2 SEIZURE DOCTORS FOLLOWING HILLARY EVERYWHERE SHE GOES? IS HILLARY CLINTON DYING FROM PARKINSON’S DISEASE, DEMENTIA, AND BRAIN DAMAGE?

WATCH HILLARY’S NEUROLOGICAL DOCTORS FOLLOW HER AROUND PRESIDENT TRUMP’S 2017 INAUGURATION AT THE WASHINGTON DC CAPITOL BUILDING! WHY ISN’T ONE (1) DOCTOR ENOUGH?

HILLARY’S RECORD OF FALLING DOWN AND GETTING INJURED BEGAN IN 2005. THAT MEANS HILLARY CLINTON HAS BEEN SUFFERING SERIOUS HEALTH PROBLEMS FOR OVER A DECADE.

WHEN HILLARY COLLAPSED AND GOT THROWN INTO HER BLACK AMBULANCE VAN (AT THE NEW YORK CITY 9/11 CEREMONY), THESE TWO DOCTORS RUSHED CLINTON ACROSS GROUND ZERO BEFORE SHE COULD BLACK OUT FROM PARKINSON’S DISEASE — BUT THEY WERE TOO LATE!

HILLARY DEMENTIA CONFIRMED BY DAUGHTER (CHELSEA):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIeg3…

HILLARY CATCHES BILL CLINTON CHECKING OUT MELANIA + IVANKA:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hkK_…

HILLARY = BIGGEST LOSER:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIeg3…

HILLARY RAMPAGE, DYING NOW?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5JoD…

CRYING HILLARY VOTERS FREAK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJAtv…

HILLARY SCREAMS AT PROTESTER:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssveO…

FOR UPDATES, SUBSCRIBE TO ‘BARRY SOETORO’ CHANNEL:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgzi…

KFC’s new facial recognition system a disturbing cocktail of the surveillance state and a toxic food supply laced with MSG

kfc-22222222222222222

(Natural News) Artificial intelligence has arrived at one Beijing fast-food restaurant… but its not without some rather nefarious side effects.

A KFC outlet in the city’s financial district now uses facial recognition software to predict what a customer might order. Partnering with KFC, tech firm Baidu, often described as the Google equivalent in China, developed the software for what is described as the country’s first “smart” restaurant.

The AI system, which is voluntarily and can be overridden if a customer wants to partake of other menu items, makes recommendations based on a customers age, gender, and mood. The kiosk then supposedly stores the information.

Customers can pay with their smartphone and then pick up the order at the counter. A KFC exec commented the target market consists of “young consumers who prefer fashionable new things,” Eco-Business detailed.

In addition to the publicity generated by the facial recognition system, KFC and Baidu want to make ordering faster, more convenient and personalized which will in their view facilitate repeat business.

Most customers at the fried chicken restaurant are still opting for a human cashier.

Apart from whether it’s wise or intelligent, as it were, to eat fast food in the first place — and Natural News offers lots of information about that — the technology also raises the question as to whether it is “smart” to order by robot from a privacy standpoint. KFC menu items, by the way, happen to contain more MSG than almost any other fast food restaurants. MSG, known as an “excitotoxin,” is a chemical taste enhancer that’s linked to migraines and widely believed to harm nerve cells. Combining a brain-hurting chemical with a “mind reading” surveillance technology seems to be a questionable cocktail of bad ideas.

Has The Colonel given way to Big Brother?

KFC plans to roll out the technology to 5,000 stores in China.

According to TechCrunch, a Baidu press release explains that “the system would tell ‘a male customer in his early 20s’ to order ‘a set meal of crispy chicken hamburger, roasted chicken wings and coke for lunch,’ while ‘a female customer in her 50s’ would get a recommendation of  ‘porridge and soybean milk for breakfast.’”

“Of course, the prospect of a company storing data about customers’ faces and fried-chicken preferences raises the ever present trade-off between convenience and privacy,” the Guardian noted, adding that, as it is, intrusive personal data in China is apparently readily available on the open market.

The Guardian reporter also found that on a second visit, the AI machine evidently “forgot” her preferences, so the technology, for better or worse, has a ways to go.

In questioning the validity of predicting menu choices from physical appearance, which may be a marketing ploy, the Quartz website also warns about the implications of data mining for the consumer.

“By building an image database of customers and their orders, KFC could get a much more deeper understanding of the market…An image and order history lets KFC begin to build a detailed dossier on each customer, stored on a machine of unknown security. If other stores implement similar systems, a whole new trove of personal data could be created. So before you order that eight-piece meal, think about the digital price you’re also paying.”

Last year, KFC implemented voice-activated robot order takers at a restaurant in Shanghai.

KFC can be an occasional guilty pleasure for some, but before ordering at one of the franchise eateries here or abroad, consider this: Natural News previously reported that the secret ingredient in the closely guarded original chicken 11-herbs-and-spices recipe might be monosodium glutamate (MSG), a chemical which has been linked to various health issues. (Related: Learn more about MSG and it’s affects.)

On the subject of fast-food automation generally, the ex-McDonald’s USA CEO recently issued a reluctant “I told you so” after predicting that the “Fight for $15,” i.e., activists who champion a $15 minimum wage, would prompt employers to begin installing touchscreen, self-service kiosks to reduce headcount, thereby increasing the ranks of the unemployed.

Sources:

Eco-business.com

Eater.com

The Guardian.com

TechCrunch.com

Qz.com

Inquisitr.com

http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-01-26-kfcs-new-facial-recognition-can-remember-a-vast-majority-of-facial-recognition.html

Self-defense is now ILLEGAL in the UK

self-defense-illegal-in-uk

(NaturalNews) The United Kingdom has been moving politically to the Left for some time now, but even in our wildest dreams, never could we have imagined that it would become illegal to protect yourself there.

As reported by The New American, British subjects seeking advice about what are and are not permissible self-defense instruments found some recently on a police web site. It is sponsored by the British government’s Police National Legal Database.

Q589: Are there any legal self defence products that I can buy?

The police answer:

The only fully legal self defence product… is a rape alarm.

Now, the site goes on to say that there may be other products, but those have yet to be fully tested and that “if you purchase one you must be aware… there is always a possibility that you will be arrested and detained until the product, it’s [sic] contents and legality can be verified.”

That’s not very reassuring, so in an effort to further reduce anxiety about “other” self-defense products, the site points out that any product a British citizen purchases other than a rape alarm “must not [be] a product which is made or adapted to cause a person injury.” Anyone possessing “such a product in public (and in private in specific circumstances) is against the law.”

No, this isn’t a joke – it’s real

The site goes on to offer more helpful hints and tips. For instance, a British citizen can use a squirt bottle filled with a safe, but brightly colored, dye that would help police find and arrest an alleged criminal – after an attack. Of course, that approach presumes that the person who is attacked survives it or is able to physically “squirt” his or her attacker before getting the stuffing knocked out of him or her.

But even then, the police database site warns, a citizen should “be aware that even a seemingly safe product… would become an offensive weapon [if] it would be used in a way that was intended to cause injury.”

Then comes this disclaimer: “The above advice is given in good faith, you must make your own decision and this website cannot be held responsible for the consequences of the possession, use or misuse of any self defence product.”

Except, of course, a rape alarm.

Ridiculous? Of course. A phony story? Hardly; click the link above and read it for yourself.

Upon learning of the website and its suggestions regarding how British citizens should, er, not defend themselves, the National Rifle Association did in fact confirm “that British subjects continue to live at the mercy of their potential attackers.” The advice reads like an appeal for victims to graciously suffer criminal violence while removing “any remaining vestiges of the traditional right to self-defense,” the group said.

Self-defense is illegal”

As further noted by The New American:

Real people have experienced the absurdity of such rules being enforced with diligence across the country. Three knife-wielding burglars [guns are illegal in England] invaded a home in England, tied up the family members and threatened to kill the father. One of the members managed to escape and get help. The family member and the helper returned and inflicted permanent brain damage on one of burglars — a criminal, by the way, with more than 50 previous convictions — using a cricket bat. Authorities arrested the defendants — the victims — and sent them to prison for more than two years. The attacker? He escaped punishment.

In another case, a well-known TV personality was seated at her kitchen table with her daughter one night when she caught several young men peering through her window. She immediately began looking around for something to use to defend herself and her daughter from what she believed was an imminent attack and found a kitchen knife. She waved it in front of them and chased them away.

But she was later visited by Hertfordshire police, who summarily informed her that the knife was an “offensive weapon” and, thus, illegal.

She wasn’t arrested, but, as a local report explained: “She was not looking to be a vigilante… but… police explained to her that even if you’re at home alone and you have an intruder, you are not allowed to protect yourself.”

If you have any plans to relocate to the UK, you might want to rethink that decision.

Sources:

http://www.thenewamerican.com

https://www.askthe.police.uk

http://www.marplerifleandpistolclub.org.uk

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/049963_self-defense_government_dependence_United_Kingdom.html#ixzz4WyLmrw7n