Daily Archives: October 16, 2016

5 Wikileaks Revelations That Should’ve Tanked Hillary’s Campaign [VIDEO]

 

Published on Oct 15, 2016

Wikileaks has now dumped over 10,000 of Hillary campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails and the insane amount of corruption and lies coming out of her camp in this election continues to ooze out in big fat slimy piles by the day… Here are five leaks that came out just this week about Hillary, any *one* of which in a sane world with fair elections (instead of rigged ones run by psycho elites) would have been enough to end her entire campaign for president by now.

WikiLeaks: Clinton Campaign Referred To Obama As ‘Crackhead’

Wikileaks reveal that Hillary Clinton campaign staff referred to Obama as a 'crackhead'

 

Wikileaks have released an email sent to John Podesta that show the Hillary Clinton campaign attempting to smear Barack Obama as a ‘crackhead’ and an ‘Islamic extremist’. 

In 2008, Clinton aides created a powerpoint presentation listing all of the tactics they could use to attack Barack Obama, focussing mostly on his alleged cocaine habit and Muslim background.

Breitbart.com reports:

In an email on January 18, 2008, Kristi Fuksa of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner research company shared a power point presentation with John Podesta and several advisers.

“Obama is not patriotic enough to be our president. His father was a Muslim and he grew up in the world’s most populated Islamic country,” read the question for voters. “At a recent public event he didn’t cover his heart during the national anthem and he has also recently stopped wearing an American flag pin.”

MORE

http://investmentwatchblog.com/wikileaks-clinton-campaign-referred-to-obama-as-crackhead/

Clinton UNDER OATH (commited PERJURY) changes story, admits she didn’t have permission for secret email server

hillary-emails-222222222222

Hillary Clinton admitted under oath this week that she doesn’t recall asking anyone for permission to use a secret server and email account during her time in the State Department, contradicting previous public pronouncements that she had received approval.

Mrs. Clinton said she didn’t recall seeing a 2011 warning about increased hacking attempts on senior department officials’ private accounts and that she didn’t actually write another warning that was sent under her name.

 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/13/hillary-clinton-admits-she-didnt-have-permission-s/

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/in-the-news/clinton-changes-story-admits-didnt-permission-secret-email-server/

http://investmentwatchblog.com/clinton-under-oath-commited-perjury-changes-story-admits-she-didnt-have-permission-for-secret-email-server/

Global Warming Crowd Said All Ice Would be Gone by September 2016. Oops!

global-warming-hoax-1111111111111111111

The global warming crowd said we had to urgently act for all sea ice would be gone by September 2016. As the Telegraph recalls, they were wrong.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/10/07/experts-said-arctic-sea-ice-would-melt-entirely-by-september-201/

 

Meanwhile, the Justice Department is deeply involved in the cover-up. The Attorney General even publicly admitted that she is looking into prosecuting people who dare to say the global warming crowd is wrong. So much for FREE SPEECH when tax money is at stake.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/10/us-attorney-general-we-may-prosecute-climate-change-deniers/

 

http://investmentwatchblog.com/global-warming-crowd-said-all-ice-would-be-gone-by-september-2016-oops/


 

Over 30,000 scientists say ‘Catastrophic Man-Made Global Warming’ is a complete hoax and science lie

AL GORE CHURCH 11111111111111111111111

(NaturalNews) The highly-politicized climate change debate rages on as we approach the crucial 2016 U.S. presidential election, despite an ever-growing body of evidence revealing the fact that “catastrophic man-made global warming” is nothing more than an elaborate hoax.And the November election may prove to be a victory for the hoaxers, according to experts who happen to be among those who dare to challenge the spurious climate change narrative.

One of these experts is Weather Channel founder John Coleman, who is now warning that the election could prove to be a “tipping point” in favor of people like Al Gore, who continue to amass vast fortunes based on the global warming scam.

In a recent interview with Climate Depot, Coleman said:

“Al Gore may emerge from the shadows to declare victory in the ‘global warming’ debate if Hillary Clinton moves into the White House. Yes, if that happens and the new climate regulations become the law of the land, they will be next to impossible to overturn for four to eight years.”

Climate change proponents remain undeterred in their mission, ignoring numerous recent scientific findings indicating that there has been no warming trend at all for nearly two decades.

Al Gore’s dire predictions of the melting of polar ice on a massive scale have proved to be completely false. In fact, in 2014 – a year that was touted as being “the hottest ever” in the Earth’s history – there were record amounts of ice reported in Antarctica, an increase in Arctic ice, and record snowfalls across the globe.

Debunking the “97 percent” lie

On top of those “inconvenient truths,” the White House’s assertion that 97 percent of scientists agree that global warming is real has been completely debunked. Several independently-researched examinations of the literature used to support the “97 percent” statement found that the conclusions were cherry-picked and misleading.

More objective surveys have revealed that there is a far greater diversity of opinion among scientists than the global warming crowd would like for you to believe.

From the National Review:

“A 2008 survey by two German scientists, Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch, found that a significant number of scientists were skeptical of the ability of existing global climate models to accurately predict global temperatures, precipitation, sea-level changes, or extreme weather events even over a decade; they were far more skeptical as the time horizon increased.”

Other mainstream news sources besides the National Review have also been courageous enough to speak out against the global warming propaganda – even the Wall Street Journal published an op-ed piece in 2015 challenging the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) pseudoscience being promulgated by global warming proponents.

And, of course, there are the more than 31,000 American scientists (to date) who have signed a petition challenging the climate change narrative and 9,029 of them hold PhDs in their respective fields. But hey, Al Gore and his cronies have also ignored that inconvenient truth, as well.

Many of those scientists who signed the petition were likely encouraged to speak out in favor of the truth after retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist John L. Casey revealed that solar cycles are largely responsible for warming periods on Earth – not human activity.

Al Gore and cronies continue getting richer from the global warming hoax

But the global warming crowd continues to push their agenda on the public while lining their pockets in the process. If you’re still inclined to believe what Al Gore has to say about global warming, please consider the fact that since he embarked on his crusade, his wealth has grown from $2 million in 2001 to $100 million in 2016 – largely due to investments in fake “green tech” companies and the effective embezzlement of numerous grants and loans.

You might want to take all of this information into serious consideration before casting your vote in the November election.

Sources:

TruthWiki.org

ClimateDepot.com

NationalReview.com

NationalReview.com

WSJ.com

PetitionProject.org

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/055151_global_warming_science_hoax_climate_skepticism.html#ixzz4J21Lq891

Monsanto Stands Trial For ‘Crimes Against Humanity’ At The Hague

Monsanto begins trial for crimes against humanity at the Hague

ADVERTISEMENT
x

Biotech giant Monsanto is facing charges of ‘crimes against humanity’ at the International Criminal Court in The Hague.

A three-day mock trial began on Friday 14 October, headed by anti-GM food activists, in order to establish a legal mechanism that could hold corporations accountable for damage they cause in the pursuit of profit.

The trial comes at a time when a damning new report was released that show Monsanto’s GMO products are not only harmful, but that their political influence in Washington and around the world have eroded democracy and caused environmental chaos and social injustice.

Activistpost.com reports:

This tribunal will consist of five international judges listening to the testimonies of thirty witnesses and experts from around the world as they tell their stories profiling the nature of Monsanto’s environmental terrorism on humanity and the planet. A website dedicated to this tribunal (monsantotribunal.org) details some of the background and specifics surrounding the goals of this upcoming tribunal:

 

The aim of the Tribunal is to give a legal opinion on the environmental and health damage caused by the multinational Monsanto. This will add to the international debate to include the crime of Ecocide into international criminal law. It will also give people all over the world a well documented legal file to be used in lawsuits against Monsanto and similar chemical companies.

Critics of Monsanto claim that the company has been able to ignore the human and environmental damage caused by its products and pursue it devastating activities through a systematic concealment strategy through lobbying regulators and government authorities, lying, corruption, commissioning bogus scientific studies, putting pressure on independent scientists, and manipulating the press.

Our endeavor is based on the observation that only through civic action will we be able to achieve compensation for victims of the American multinational. The procedures are a veritable obstacle course for the victims. They are reluctant to invest time and money in litigation, especially since there is no reason to believe in a positive outcome. Frequently, when a company like Monsanto is the defendant, the company settles out of court, whereby circumventing the establishment of a negative legal precedent.

General purpose of the Tribunal:

To get a ruling- even symbolic – against Monsanto by a bench of real judges, after veritable proceedings in an international court, and contribute to the establishment of international mechanisms to bring justice to victims of multinationals.

Specific objectives:

  • Assess the case against Monsanto and the damages caused pursuant to international law;
  • Assess Monsanto’s actions in relation to the crime of ecocide. Citizens’ movements have made an appeal for international criminal law to recognize this as a crime;
  • Consider a possible amendment of the Rome Statute establishing the International
  • Criminal Court to include the crime of ecocide, making it possible to try natural and legal persons for this crime.

As you can see, this tribunal is only looking to set the groundwork for a system that needs to be in place for not only halting all of Monsanto’s global genocidal activities but for eventually holding the criminals that run Monsanto and the conspirators who invest in this terrorist entity accountable for their direct and indirect crimes against humanity.

Interestingly this tribunal holds Monsanto to the standards of the UN’s Agenda 21/Agenda 2030 which calls for things like “sustainable environment,” the right to eat healthy food, the right to the enjoyment of the highest standard of health, and even the violation of the freedom of scientific research. Above and beyond all of this, the very serious question of Monsanto’s outright war crimes against humanity will be posed.

Ironically these questions will ultimately be posed to the UN, the same system that labels the natural and necessary nutrient known as CO2 a “pollutant,” so it will be interesting to say the least to see what if anything comes of this on the part of the United Nations.

That the UN labels CO2, arguably the most necessary compound in the planet (O2 notwithstanding) as a “pollutant” but needs to be prodded and pushed to recognize Monsanto’s obvious callous crimes against humanity and nature is alarming in and of itself. While CO2 is the source of all plant life on Earth and thus central to life as we know it, Monsanto has poisoned the planet with their GMO seeds and glyphosate-laced Roundup (admitted to be toxic by the CDC) which has caused irreversible damage to the planet and humanity. The spectrum of genetic and biochemical damage caused by Monsanto’s poisons range from the unnecessary murder of tiny insects needed for the ecologic balance of nature to the destruction and killing of plants around the world, to the poisoning of animals and humans as rates of birth defects, cancer, endocrine disruption and much more have all risen, many which have been associated with Monsanto-like poisons.

You may be wondering, how did we get here? As the tribunal summary indicates, by greed and corruption. Monsanto has employed the same model as the vaccine industry; make profits, pay hush money to those that are injured or killed by your product, and wage an information war of propaganda against your enemies even as the scientific community admits there is no proof that GMOs are safe and scientific evidence proves that GMOs are directly associated with the development of tumors in rats (Seralini study) when given for a duration of time comparable to the lifespan of that creature (unlike the Monsanto’s deceptive “6 month” studies with rats).

In the worst-case scenario I believe this will at least serve as a formal record for the future of humanity to see the criminal actions of Monsanto, and hopefully it will be a stepping stone toward justice and accountability even if it borrows the new world order’s language of “sustainability” and “prosperity.” If Monsanto is not held criminally responsible for their crimes against humanity this will also tell you all you need to know about the true nature of the pseudo “global authority” known as the United Nations, which to this day has no credibility when it comes to true justice and human rights worldwide. Failure to take decisive action against Monsanto’s atrocities against humanity and the planet will offer an opportunity to once again prove the fraudulent front that the UN represents in the first place. Let’s not forget the UN is also the useless “official” government body of the new world order conveniently created by the ruling elite themselves after world war 2. Thus getting one’s hopes up too high about this upcoming tribunal without acknowledging the true nature and commitment of the UN is naïve.

http://investmentwatchblog.com/monsanto-stands-trial-for-crimes-against-humanity-at-the-hague/

Clinton press secretary boasts about harassing reporter into silence, spiking story

Image: Clinton press secretary boasts about harassing reporter into silence, spiking story

One of the most important elements of the Regressive Left’s influence is their ability to convince the brainwashed sheep of the world that they are the only morally correct choices in the world of politics. Supporting anyone else makes you an evil, sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic bigot. They use this kind of language to guilt-trip the youth of America into rejecting conservative ideals and getting behind politicians that are destroying America dollar by dollar.

Of all the horrible offenders of such a method, Hillary Clinton and her goons could very well be the worst of the bunch. After all, their entire campaign has been based around the moral choices that we all make. It’s not much of a surprise, considering the only thing that the left can possibly say they are more refined that the right on is “morality,” but when you take a real look at Hillary Clinton, this is even more ridiculous. After all, Hillary is one of the least morally conscious people on the planet. All she wants is to be in control of the world — and she’ll stop at nothing to get there.

 <a href=”http://www.newstarget.com/middle-1.html”> <img src=”http://www.newstarget.com/middle-1.jpg” width=”300″ height=”250″ alt=”NT1″ /> </a&gt

A bright light has been exposing the truth behind the Clinton campaign for months, but a recent revelation regarding press secretary Nick Merrill make the whole bunch seem even more disgusting. Merrill pressured Emily Kopp, a reporter for The Intercept , to keep her from running a story regarding Clinton’s corruption.

Government Slaves reports, “The article in question detailed how Clinton used the Hillary Victory Fund as a personal ‘slush fund,’ yet Merrill repeatedly refuted the authenticity of Kopp’s reporting in a question and answer series he shared on the email chain.” It’s no wonder that Merrill was trying to prevent the truth from being revealed, since almost all of Hillary’s charitable efforts have been revealed to be complete scams, but it doesn’t make the news any less disturbing.

Clinton and her cronies desire power more than anything in the world, and they want so desperately for their candidate to be elected this fall, but that means certain doom for the rest of us. Crooked Hillary has shown time and time again that she doesn’t care about any of us — she only cares about herself.

We need to do everything we can to prevent her from being victorious. We need a strong leader and a president that will treat the American people like human beings instead of slaves. We don’t need Hillary Clinton.

Sources:

GovtSlaves.info

Politico.com

http://newstarget.com/2016-10-14-clinton-press-secretary-boasts-about-harrassing-reporter-into-silence-spiking-story.html