Daily Archives: August 30, 2016

Confirmed: Huma Abedin’s Mom Leading FEMALE Genital Mutilation Supporter [VIDEO]

 

Published on Aug 30, 2016

Huma Abedin’s mother is a leading advocate for female genital mutilation and is once again linked to the Muslim brotherhood.

 


 

Female genital mutilation, also known as FGM refers to all procedures which partially or completely remove the external female genitalia so females do not enjoy sex.

 

 

 

Advertisements

U.S. Gov’t. Says It’s No Longer Against Al Qaeda

AL QAEDA 111111111111111111111

Eric Zuesse, originally posted at strategic-culture.org

“We’re not focused on the former al-Nusra Front [Al Qaeda in Syria]. We’re focused on Daesh [ISIS]. And that’s what we’re fighting and that’s where therefore we look and where we target.” U.S.Defense Department press briefing, 16 August 2016

Basic to America’s war against terrorism was Al Qaeda as being the specific target, but, on August 16th, a U.S. Defense Department spokesperson said that Al Qaeda is no longer an enemy of the United States at all, and that only ISIS is America’s enemy in the war against terrorism. However, Congress never authorized anything but Al Qaeda to be the enemy in the war against terrorism. Consequently, President Obama is now violating the law by his no longer targeting Al Qaeda at all, and he is also ignoring the law by his targeting ISIS (as he has long been doing) without requesting a new authorization from Congress to do so — an authorization that both Democrats and Republicans in Congress would be virtually certain to grant immediately. This new war-authorization would need to rectify a key failing of the original war-authorization, by naming “jihadism” specifically as America’s enemy, so that regardless of what a particular jihadist group is, it can legally be a target to eliminate. Under the existing resolution, only Al Qaeda can be targeted, because that was the group which was ultimately determined to have caused 9/11, and because the existing war-authorization is restricted to only the organization that perpetrated that specific jihadist act. This new war-authorization would thus need to replace, instead of modify, the existing authorization, so that U.S. military action can legally be taken against any jihadist group, and not only (as at present) against Al Qaeda.

The Congressional resolution that on 14 September 2001 authorized the U.S. President to make war in response to 9/11, declared the President “authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.” That was subsequently interpreted to refer to Al Qaeda. Bush invaded Iraq on 19 March 2003 by declaring that Iraq supported Al Qaeda. Congress — including Hillary Clinton and America’s ‘news’ media — accepted that allegation and never challenged Bush on it, and so authorized him to invade, for 12 reasons, of which five were:

• Members of al-Qaeda, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq.

• Iraq’s “continu[ing] to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations,” including anti-United States terrorist organizations.

• Iraq paid bounty to families of suicide bombers.

• The efforts by the Congress and the President to fight terrorists, and those who aided or harbored them.

• The authorization by the Constitution and the Congress for the President to fight anti-United States terrorism.

In other words: One reason was that Iraq was behind “anti-United States terrorism,” and another was that Al Qaeda was “known to be in Iraq,” but there were five reasons in total that referred to the 9/11 event — and yet this resolution had to do with Iraq, not with 9/11.

So: the two resolutions on the basis of which Obama is ‘authorized’ by Congress to oppose ‘terrorism’ (meaning only Islamic terrorism, more correctly known as jihadism) are specifically against Al Qaeda. That’s what he’s authorized to fight. The Iraq-invasion resolution did more generally include also “other international terrorist organizations,” but pertains only to Iraq (and President Bush announced that that war against Iraq was over; so, the U.S. now operates militarily in Iraq only with explicit authorization from Iraq’s government).

In Syria, Al Qaeda was called Al Nusra, and they recently changed their name and are sometimes referred to as “the former Al Nusra,” but they’re Al Qaeda in Syria, whatever their name.

However, the U.S. ‘Defense’ Department held a press briefing, on 16 August 2016 in Baghdad, concerning both Syria and Iraq, and asserted that the U.S. isn’t concerned about Al Qaeda, in either Syria or Iraq, but only about “ISIL” or ISIS, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, which the Sauds call DAESH (the Arabic acronym for ISIL) and so he did too:

“We’re not focused on the former al-Nusra Front. We’re focused on Daesh. And that’s what we’re fighting and that’s where therefore we look and where we target.”

Now the only U.S. target in the war against ‘terrorism’ is the only jihadist organization that wants to defeat and replace the Saud family — the family that (along with George W. Bush) was behind 9/11.

Here’s the video of that comment by him, and of the journalist’s then angering that Pentagon spokesman at 3:25 by referring to Al Nusra as “forces that might be backed by the United States” (at which phrase the journalist’s eyes went down to the ground in recognition that he is aware that that has actually been true all along in Syria — that the U.S. has been supporting every jihadist (or ’terrorist’) group there (especially Al Nusra) except “Daesh,” because they’re all trying to overthrow Assad (and because DAESH are threatening to overthrow the Sauds for being insufficiently Islamic). So, because DAESH-ISIS are a threat to the Sauds, the U.S. focuses its war-effort (in addition to being against Assad) against ISIS, and ignores the other jihadists in Syria. All of the jihadists in Syria are fighting to overthrow Assad, and so (other than the Sauds’ enemy, ISIS), all of the jihadists in Syria are actually strong assets to the U.S. war against Assad. 

The Pentagon spokesperson started his response to that with a personal comment, and then simply repeated that the U.S. doesn’t care about Al Nusra or any other jihadist group except “Daesh.”

Actually, Obama isn’t authorized to carry out any military operation against “Daesh,” because the 9/11 resolution “authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.” And ISIS didn’t even exist back then. We hadn’t produced it yet.

Congress hasn’t authorized him to have any military operation to overthrow Assad. Nor even any military operation to kill ISIS. Obama is a renegade U.S. President who hates Russians and who wants to kill any nation’s leader who is friendly toward Russia (such as Gaddafi, Yanukovych, and Assad). And with the cooperation of the Congress and the ‘news’ media that are controlled by the same U.S. aristocracy that controls him, he’s being given a virtually free rein to do just this — regardless of the existing laws.

There is massive additional evidence that the Obama Administration is actually supporting Al Qaeda in Syria. For example, one of the main sticking points in the U.S-Russian negotiations to achieve a cease-fire in the Syrian war concerned America’s insistence — and Russia’s opposition to — suspending the war against Al Nusra: the U.S. demanded that only ISIS continue to be attacked during a cease-fire, whereas Russia demanded that both ISIS and Al Nusra continue to be attacked; U.S. Secretary of State Kerry finally (and very reluctantly) agreed to accept Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov’s position on that. Members of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff resigned and were fired by President Obama for refusing to endorse his insistence upon protecting Al Nusra.

The truth is that Barack Obama is obsessed against Russia, and that Assad is an ally of Russia, and Obama wants to overthrow him the way that he and his predecessor overthrew other nations’ leaders who were friendly or allied with Russia: Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, and Viktor Yanukovych. Obama is trying to win World War III, not the Cold War — which, in his mind, never ended, and cannot end, until Russia itself becomes surrounded and conquered.

Like Obama’s friend and advisor Zbigniews Brzezinski argued in his 1997 The Grand Chessboard, and Obama evidently also believes, this is a “chess game” that will be won only once the Russians’ ‘king’ (ruling elite) gets overthrown while the American ‘king’ (ruling elite) is still standing. And that’s the way the U.S. aristocracy (and its agents, including the ‘news’ media, and the U.S. government) handle it.

The American public think that jihadists are our enemy, but the American aristocracy have no problem with jihadists — their friends, the Saudi aristocracy, are competing in the oil-and-gas market against the Russians, not against the jihadists.

And America’s aristocracy couldn’t care less about the American public.

And that’s why a U.S. President is allowed to break U.S. law with impunity, and say (through an agent) “we’re not focused on the former al-Nusra Front. We’re focused on Daesh. And that’s what we’re fighting and that’s where therefore we look and where we target.”

U.S. Gov’t. Says It’s No Longer Against Al Qaeda

HUMA DUMPING WEINER AFTER ANOTHER STUPID SEXTING SCANDAL IS BAIT AND SWITCH TO DRAW ATTENTION AWAY FROM HILLARY’S HEALTH AND THE CLINTON FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION

WEINER (v_F).indd

 

It’s all over the news today that Anthony Weiner sent “one sext too many” and top Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin is finally calling it quits and ending their marriage.

Because, it was such a wonderful marriage…

huma-weiner-wedding

Gosh she looks so happy…

Most people recognize how much of a sham their relationship was from the beginning. Saying these two (look at her face above on their wedding day, she looks super thrilled) had a legitimate marriage is like saying Hillary and Bill Clinton’s marriage is real and not a cover under which they further their political dynasty power interests.

Now Huma is back in the news and the Clinton Foundation is officially under investigation (not that it will go anywhere while FBI Director Comey, who has been covering for the Clintons for decades, is in charge but whatever), and despite fake pickle jar openings on Jimmy Kimmel Live, Hillary’s health issues are not quietly going away either.

This camp needed something to draw attention away from all this bad press.

Thus, you have Weiner caught sexting a picture of his crotch next to his sleeping baby???

First of all, who would even do that?

Secondly, come on already. How many times has this man been “caught” doing this? Even a toddler learns that he will burn his hand if he places on a hot stove enough times. Are we really supposed to believe Anthony Weiner is this much of a drooling idiot? If he’s really this stupid, it’s surprising he can tie his shoes in the morning without killing himself.

No. This was perfectly timed to draw attention away from what’s really going on that could mar Hillary’s ascension to the White House throne. That throwaway marriage was always there for distraction and cover purposes. Now it’s serving it’s final purpose like the joke it has always been.

Fitting, actually.

This photo is even making the rounds as the moment Hillary heard the news about the Weiner’s latest sext:

READ MORE:

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/huma-dumping-weiner-after-yet-another-stupid-sexting-scandal-is-bait-and-switch-to-draw-attention-away-from-hillarys-health-and-the-clinton-foundation-investigation_082016

 

WikiLeaks Prepares for Release of More Clinton Emails Ahead of Election

emails 11111111111111111

Source: Kurt Nimmo

Last Wednesday, Fox News conducted an interview with WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange.

Assange said the release of more Clinton emails is in the works.

“We have a lot of material, thousands of pages of material,” Assange told Megyn Kelly. “There’s a variety of different types of documents and different types of institutions that are associated with the election campaign, some quite unexpected angles that are, you know, quite interesting, some even entertaining.”

Assange’s timing is designed to inflict damage at crucial junctures in the election cycle. The DNC emails were released during the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia and ultimately resulted in the removal of Debbie Wasserman Schultz as the DNC boss.

Kelly asked if the next leak will be a “game changer” and Assange said it would.

“I think it’s significant. You know, it depends on how it catches fire in the public and in the media,” he said.

Media pickup of any future story is crucial. Earlier this week, the establishment media ran with stories criticizing WikiLeaks, accusing the whistleblower organization of exposing data insensitive to gay people, sick children and rape victims.

Tweets went out accusing The Huffington Post, The Independent, Mediaite  and others of fabrication and distorting the facts. Much of the information attributed to WikiLeaks came from other sources.

The effort to discredit WikiLeaks is coordinated in part by the elite of the Democratic party.

“Democratic leaders are putting out a warning that could help inoculate Hillary Clinton against an October cyber surprise: Any future mass leaks of embarrassing party emails might contain fake information inserted by Russian hackers,” Politico reported with an explanation saying the information came from a conference call between Rep. Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic Party leaders who are strategizing how to minimize the fallout from leaks.

Clinton has avoided addressing numerous controversies by shunning the press and refusing to hold press conferences, thus allowing a friendly corporate media to fend off criticism of the candidate. She has not held a press conference for 260 days.

The Washington Post criticized this tactic:

Jokes aside, it’s beyond ridiculous that one of the two people who will be elected president in 80 or so days continues to refuse to engage with the press in this way.

But she does sit-down interviews! And she did a “press conference” with a moderator, um, moderating the questions!

Not good enough. Not when you are running to be president of the United States. One of the most important things when someone is offering themselves up to represent all of us is that we get the best sense we can about how that person thinks on his or her feet, how they deal with unwanted or adversarial questions. Those two traits are big parts of doing the job of president in the modern world.

There’s nothing like a press conference to put a candidate for president through their paces. If you don’t believe me, just watch how Clinton handled this presser — not well! — when she tried to put the email server controversy to rest.

In the end, the corporate media effort to ignore or underplay the damage inflicted by revelations of Clinton’s corruption and lawbreaking may prove successful, especially when the audience is a largely disengaged electorate.

Meanwhile, the establishment heaps dirt on the campaign of Donald Trump every single day, thus revealing its preference and bias.

 

Share This Article…

http://www.blacklistednews.com/WikiLeaks_Prepares_for_Release_of_More_Clinton_Emails_Ahead_of_Election/53808/0/38/38/Y/M.html

CHAOS Will Erupt Across America In Less Than 100 Days…

Social chaos

[8/30/16]  MIKE ADAMS-The clock is ticking for America. There are 70 days remaining until the presidential election, and after the results are counted, America will be a tinderbox ready to explode no matter who wins.

What follows is an educated analysis of the political friction now escalating in America. Note carefully that nothing in this article should be construed as any intention to call for violence of any kind. I do reference such acts, however, as part of human history as well as likely outcomes in our near future. What I’m offering here is an analysis and a warning, along with a call to prepare for what’s coming.

If Trump wins, the left goes full terror

As I’ve publicly predicted numerous times over the last year, if Donald Trump wins, the radical extreme leftists go on a violent rampage that leads to the rest of us begging for martial law. After half a dozen cities burn with riots and looting, Trump invokes a national emergency, deploying National Guard troops across the most devastated urban areas, and the radical left finds itself in a shooting war with the government.

If Hillary Clinton wins, all the Trump supporters who have been violently assaulted, spat upon and physically attacked by the radical left un-holster their concealed weapons and start shooting back. This quickly escalates into open warfare between lunatic leftist Hillary supporters and armed Trump “Second Amendment” people who basically figure they’ve got nothing left to lose anyway, so why not fight to save America?

This was all pointed out in an insightful reader comment posted to The Burning Platform on August 29th:

With the rise of Donald Trump, the plan of the political elites has been to provoke violence and blame it on him, thus scaring the normal populace. Early-on there were the road-blockings, the threatened riots, the cancelled events in Chicago and Cincinnati, the beatings, the police ordered to “look the other way”…and it has continued: The screaming harassment and physical attacks on Trump supporters as they leave his rallies. The spitting. The intimidation. The thrown eggs. The shoves and punches. The cars blocked and damaged. The hats snatched off people’s heads, stomped on, and then burned on the ground…

The people who support Trump are increasingly well-armed, and increasingly seething with justifiable rage. For now they hold back. Donald Trump himself has repeatedly observed that “the safest place in America” for anti-Trump protesters is at Trump rallies. And that is true. For now (except for the one old cowboy who punched out the protester, he was an octogenarian outlier). Why is this? Why the docility in the face of clear provocation?

It is because Trump supporters understand that any retaliatory violence now will be instantly, widely, and incessantly portrayed by the whorish mainstream media as proof that “Trump is dangerous” and “Trump’s movement is violent” and “Trump invites violence.” So his supporters endure the abuse. They endure the spittle. They endure the shoves and punches. They endure the theft of their possessions. They endure the damaged cars and the incessant harassment. For now, for the sake of their political movement and the candidacy of Donald Trump, they do not strike back…

But what happens after the election? It matters not who wins. If Hillary Clinton is elected, by hook or by crook, the mass movement harnessed by Donald Trump will be free to respond to physical attacks. If Donald Trump wins the Presidency, there will similarly be no reason to continue to endure physical attacks and humiliations by the street thugs of the Democrats. Whether Trump or Hillary Clinton is in the White House, there will be no reason to hold back.

Hundreds of millions of guns across America are now in the hands of people who are fed up with being stomped on, ridiculed and marginalized by a corrupt leftist regime that’s destroying America

Do the math on this one: You’ve got 44% of U.S. households that now own guns (and not just one gun each, but several different types of guns). Over the last 8 years, President Obama’s anti-gun rhetoric has resulted in the largest surge of gun sales to private citizens ever recorded in American history. As a result of Obama’s criminal efforts to try to destroy the Second Amendment via false flag operations such as Operation Fast and Furious, more Americans than ever now own battle rifles such as ARs, AKs and PTR 91s.

People bought all these guns for a reason. And they sure didn’t buy them just to turn them over to a corrupt criminal government.

The reader comment continues:

Whatever happens after this Presidential election, it will have been unleashed by the corporate elites and their servants in the media and elsewhere. They will be responsible for blood in the streets… And many will cheer it.

What the author is saying is, essentially, America is quite likely just 70 days away from the start of the next revolution… or even events that could escalate into Civil War.

A Hillary victory would set off an immediate popular revolt

If Hillary wins the election, it’s hard not to imagine some sort of popular revolt across America as the citizens reject the obvious criminality and corruption of not just the Clinton crime family but also a complicit mainstream media. The same media that has funneled millions of dollars into the Clinton Foundation also intentionally downplays all the Clinton scandals. The entire system is a corrupt, incestuous, rigged f–kfest that benefits the deceitful plutocrats whom the voters are sick and tired of seeing remain in power.

As world history teaches us, it would only take a tiny fraction of the American people marching on Washington to overthrow the corrupt regime and install a new interim government while arresting the mainstream journalists and calling for new, open elections. So much of America is already at the breaking point now that such a move would very likely enjoy widespread support from the population at large.

Such actions are far more common than you might suspect in other countries around the world. When the masses reach their limit on corruption and criminality at the highest levels of government, history has shown they frequently march on the capitol, arrest the traitors, and install new officials to run the government. Sometimes, these people end up being dictators or tyrants who make things worse, so such actions should never be taken lightly. Revolt should only be the very last, reluctant option after every legal, democratic method of restoring the law has been attempted and denied.

If any of this sounds surprising to you, you probably need to study world history and read about the French Revolution, the Bolivar campaign across South America, the Fidel Castro takeover of Cuba, the CIA-instigated revolutions of Central and South American nations, the Cultural Revolution of China, and of course the American Revolution. If you don’t know anything about history, then you have no clue how history reliably repeats itself as human populations re-experience the same tyrannies, the same political deceptions and the same inner call for freedom that our ancestors already lived through (or died for).

There’s nothing new under the sun… everything we are about to experience has happened before. (And the Clintons are nothing new, either. They’re the same old corrupt crony tyrants and sleaze peddlers we’ve always seen seeking power to rule over others.)

If Trump wins, the globalist banksters crash the debt bubble to unleash mass chaos

Now let’s shift gears and explore what happens if Trump wins the election. The day after the election results show Trump to be the clear winner, radical leftists break out into mass protests across America. But Obama is still in power at this point, and Trump won’t actually occupy the White House until early 2017. So for the remainder of 2016, Obama will open the borders wide open and even encourage as many illegals as possible to invade the USA in a final “mad dash” to the USA.

CHAOS Will Erupt Across America In Less Than 100 Days…

Sandy Hook Justice website killed?

sandy hook 222222222222222222

HERE IS THE WEBSITE:

http://sandyhookjusticereport.com/


 

This is (or was) the website of Wolfgang Halbig, who was digging into the Sandy Hook deception. There was another FOIA hearing last week but when an alert reader went to check for the update, they got this message.

 Mike has emailed Wolfgang but received no reply. If anyone knows what is going on please let MIKE RIVERO at WHATREALLYHAPPENED.COM know at email : 

wrh@whatreallyhappened.com,