Monthly Archives: January 2016

Brother of 9/11 Victim Hopes to Bring WTC Evidence to Court



Matt Campbell Seeks Supporters for His Legal Campaign


By 911TruthOutreach and Other Contributors

UK citizen Matt Campbell lost his brother, Geoff, in the North Tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

In the ensuing years, Matt has been on a quest to find a route to justice for his brother’s murder. He has helped expose the fact that the official story is incontrovertibly wrong — that hijacked planes and fires could not possibly be the sole reason for the destruction of the Twin Towers.

Specifically, he has educated government officials and the media by introducing them to the evidence supporting the theory of controlled demolitions. This evidence has been outlined by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in its documentary, 9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out, and in its booklet, Beyond Misinformation: What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7. Explosives explain the observed high-speed ejection — outside the footprint of the Twin Towers — of not only structural material, but also the remains of his brother.

Now Matt is pursuing a legal strategy to force a correction to the official story and bring some semblance of justice to his brother.

geoff campbell 300Geoff CambellGeoff Campbell was on a floor near the top of the 110-story North Tower that morning. His fragmented remains were identified by DNA in 2002, 2004, 2008, and, most recently, in 2013. Matt’s tireless efforts on both sides of the Atlantic have gone far to show that the US and UK governments have covered up the evidence of explosives with the cooperation of the media. The only avenue that remains open is legal action through the courts.

On March 23, 2015, Matt went to court in Hastings, UK, for refusing to pay his TV license fees on the basis that the BBC has deliberately covered up incontrovertible evidence relating to how his brother was murdered. (You can read AE911Truth’s recent review of Tony Rooke’s film Incontrovertible about that very evidence.)

In his court appearance, Matt claimed that because the BBC is concealing the evidence about 9/11, it is supporting terrorism by protecting the true perpetrators. Consequently, his paying a BBC license fee would put him in breach of Section 15 of the 2000 Terrorism Act (UK), which makes it illegal to provide financial support to any organization that supports terrorism. Therefore, by paying his TV license fee he would be committing a serious crime. A summary of that effort was outlined in the March 2015 9/11 Truth Outreach Newsletter.



Matt’s brother Geoff appears to have been one of the people who showed up on time for Risk Waters Group’s inaugural Waters Financial Technology Congress at the “Windows on the World” on the 106th floor of the North Tower. About 150 people were expected at the event, and conference hosts estimated that 65 of them had actually arrived when American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building about 15 floors below the conference location.

Of the 67 British victims of 9/11, ten were at the conference (eight were staff and two were attendees). Four victims had some of their remains found and identified — including Geoff’s.

“The amount of the remains identified for the victims,” Matt says, “showed that for one victim, most of a body was recovered (about 86%), three victims were identified with a much smaller range of recovered body material (2-3%), and six people had so little remaining body material that the amount of identified remains was rounded to zero percent recovered (0%) and a DNA match was the only way to prove a victim’s identity. This is an interesting range of percentages.”

Matt asks, “What could cause this range of recovered body parts from nearly complete to essentially ‘vaporized’? Perhaps it was proximity to explosives?”


Matt Campbell Embassy US UK 768 9/11 Commission Report burned at US Embassy in the UK by victim’s brother, Matt Cambell, then gets fined for doing so.

2013 Inquest Findings


A January 2013 inquest into Geoff’s death concluded: “At 8.46 am on 11 September 2001 the deceased was on the 106th floor of the North Tower of World Trade Centre when an aircraft (AA11) was deliberately flown into the building, causing its collapse at 10.28am. This event was part of a coordinated attack by the Islamist militant group Al-Qaeda.”

No evidence has been produced to back up any of this narrative’s conclusion. The FBI refused to provide authenticated evidence of the alleged hijackers boarding flight American Airlines Flight 11. The National Institute of Standards and Technology was tasked only with investigating up to “collapse initiation” — a limited scope that did not include reconciling its findings with the observations of the actual “collapse” of the towers.

According to Campbell, the inquest relied heavily on the widely discredited 9/11 Commission Report, which should have been considered hearsay from a legal perspective. The testimony before the 9/11 Commission was not testimony taken under oath and therefore never should have been allowed as evidence in an inquest, he believes. This is especially egregious, in his view, because the UK authorities did not perform an independent investigation to substantiate its validity. The inquest did not acknowledge that the alleged involvement of Al-Qaeda was only established under “harsh” interrogation techniques, the records of which were destroyed and never reviewed by members of the 9/11 Commission.

Petition for a Fresh Inquest


After weighing possible next steps, Matt and his colleagues are planning to use the legal process available to them to petition the US Attorney General to call for a fresh inquest. New evidence that will be used to support this renewed inquest is the announcement that further remains of Geoff were identified in May 2013. These additional remains, coupled with more evidence that has been compiled and documented of the controlled demolition of the Twin Towers, may be enough to bring the issue to a Coroner’s court, according to Matt.

He and his team have a meeting with a QC barrister who is interested in taking on the case. (The designation “QC” stands for Queen’s Counsel — a particularly eminent, learned jurist appointed as one of Her Majesty’s Counsel.) The meeting will assess the merits of the claim and what, if any, further evidence is required.

Matt has initiated a crowd-funding effort to help defray the costs of this new legal route. He is asking for support from those who wish to help to: 1) obtain justice for Geoff, 2) get into court records the scientific evidence for controlled demolition, as documented by AE911Truth, and 3) expose the official narrative of 9/11 for what it is — a lie that, according to Matt, “started the mendacious, meretricious ‘war on terror’ which has killed thousands of servicemen and women and millions of innocent men, women, and children.”





The case for coffee being bad for you sure has collapsed over the last few years. And I thought the science was settled!

COFFEE 11111111111

MORE GOOD NEWS ABOUT COFFEE: Irregular Heartbeats? Coffee May Not Be So Bad for You.

People with irregular heartbeats are often advised to give up caffeine, but a new study suggests they may not have to forgo their coffee.

Researchers had 1,388 people record their intake of coffee, tea and chocolate over a one-year period, and used Holter monitors to get 24-hour electrocardiograms.

More than 60 percent of the participants reported consuming one or more caffeine-containing foods daily. But the electrocardiograms revealed no differences in premature beats or episodes of accelerated heart rate between caffeine users and abstainers. The study is in the Journal of the American Heart Association.

“There’s no clear evidence that drinking more caffeine increases the risk for early beats,” said the senior author, Dr. Gregory M. Marcus, an associate professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco. In fact, evidence from other studies suggests caffeine may even be linked to decreased rates of cardiovascular problems.

my cardiologist just told me to replace morning coffee with tea. i told him ” no, that whole idea was unamerican”. he said, “yeah, I wouldn’t do it either”.



Are vaccines the cause of the baby brain deformity in Brazil blamed on Zika?

ZIKA 66666666666

The Zika virus outbreak in Brazil has been blamed on mosquito bites, but the real cause of the children born with a brain defect called microcephaly may not be the Zika virus. The Zika virus is transmitted by mosquitoes. However, sources report that only a FEW of the infants born with this condition had ANY evidence of the Zika virus in their brains. Brazil had fewer than 150 cases of microcephaly in the all of 2014, but there have been more than 3,500 reported cases since October 2015. At the same time, in 2015, Brazil instituted a mandatory vaccine policy for pregnant women. Could vaccines be causing the brain defect in infants in Brazil?

The WHO website states…

“The link with Zika has not been confirmed. But some babies who died had the virus in their brain and it has been detected in placenta and amniotic fluid too.”

Are vaccines a cause of the microcephaly brain deformity occurring in Brazil?

It has been shown that vaccine injection can cross the blood brain barrier in utero, if the blood brain barrier has not been fully formed. In Brazil, mandatory vaccination of expectant mothers was instituted in early 2015. Brazil’s Minister of Health required a new TDAP vaccines be given to all expectant mothers. TDAP is a new type of DPT vaccine, which contains vaccines for diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus. Pertussis vaccines have been given to pregnant women in England since 2012 and have not been known to cause risk to the pregnancies or the infants.

About the Tdap vaccine

The Tdap vaccine is a reduced-dose acellular pertussis vaccine that also includes tetanus and diphtheria vaccines. Since 2011, The Tdap shot has been recommended by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) for women at 20 weeks of gestation. The FDA classifies the Tdap as a Class C drug, which means that is it NOT SAFE to be given during pregnancy, and there have been no test to see if the Tdap is safe for pregnant women. Research is underway at Vanderbilt University, where the hope is that vaccinating the pregnant mothers will pass along the immunity in utero to the children but this research has not yet been published.

What the World Health Organization says about the Zika virus

On Jan 21, 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) stated “The Brazilian authorities believe the increase (in brain deformities) is caused by an outbreak of Zika virus.” The WHO has previously stated, “Zika is generally mild and only causes symptoms in one in five people”. On Jan 28, 2016, the WHO director general Dr Margaret Chan declared that Zika has escalated “from a mild threat to one of alarming proportions”. WHO has established a Zika “emergency team” because there has been what is called an “explosive” spread of the virus.

What are symptoms of the Zika virus?

Most people who have the Zika virus have little or no symptoms. Some people experience a fever or get a rash. Other symptoms include headaches, joint pain, or eye redness (conjunctivitis).

How does Zika spread?

The carriers of the Zika virus are a mosquito with the scientific name of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. The same mosquito also spreads dengue fever and chikungunya fever. These mosquitoes are active in the daytime, unlike the mosquitoes that spread malaria which are only active at night. The mosquito bites a person who is infected with the virus and then spreads the infection when they bite another person.

Could GMO mosquitoes be causing the outbreak of Zika virus?

Beginning in 2011, the British biotech company Oxitec has released GMO mosquitoes in Brazil. This strain of Aedes mosquitoes has been genetically modified to help eliminate dengue fever, which is spread by the Aedes mosquito. Up to 2 million GMO mosquitoes are produced each week in the Brazilian factory.

There is not yet a sure link between the Zika virus and brain deformities seen in Brazil. This link needs to be further established. Research on the efficacy of the Tdap vaccine also needs to be quickly published and brought to light. Further information about the GMO mosquitoes also needs further elucidation.



Zika virus in Brazil raises mosquito and vaccine questions

Pentagon delays release of images of tortured Afghan, Iraqi prisoners despite court order [VIDEO]


Published on Jan 30, 2016

The American military has again delayed the publication of images of torture in US prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan. They were supposed to be released on Friday under a court order. The American Civil Liberties Union requested the photographs over 10 years ago, after the scandal surrounding Abu Ghraib broke. Back then, the media released pictures showing the abuse and humiliation of detainees at the facility in Baghdad. The Pentagon agreed to release just 10 percent of the requested two thousand images, but that hasn’t happened.

Women Told to Stop Having Babies as Zika Virus / Microcephaly Panic Spreads [VIDEO]


Published on Jan 30, 2016